Search for: "JANE DOE " Results 2061 - 2080 of 3,508
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
‘, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly April 11, 2013 [Abstract] Digital Media Law Project, Berkman Center: We Have a New Name Professor Patrick Keyzer (lead author), Jane Johnston, Sharon Rodrick, Anne Wallace, Geoff Holland and Mark Pearson. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:10 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00672-JMS-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:09 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00671-JMS-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:08 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00670-JMS-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:06 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00668-JMS-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Justice Lloyd Karmeier filed a compelling dissent, joined by Justice Mary Jane Theis. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am by Terry Hart
The exclusive right to publicly perform a copyrighted work1 has been the source of a fair amount of confusion over its history. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:38 am by Laura Orr
You can find a list of the Oregon’s recent BitTorrent and Peer-to-Peer (download) cases, copies of complaints, and other information at the Oregon Intellectual Property Law’s February 26, 2013, post: List of Oregon Download Cases – 2013. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 2:28 am by Susan Brenner
It’s a matter of common sense and fairness.If hearsay weren’t excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say Jane Doe told him the defendant – Richard Roe – who’s on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 1:07 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Reuters tells us that a second DHS official working on cybersecurity issues, Deputy Secretary Jane Holl Lute, will leave her post. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:17 pm
This panel, which was moderated by Prof Jane Ginsburg and composed of eminent European personalities, has just finished discussing recent case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 2:35 pm by Jonathan Bailey
I haven’t spoken a great deal about the Jane Goodall plagiarism scandal. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:19 pm by Employment Lawyers
NOTE:  If you posses knowledge about a true trade secret maintained by your former employer, then you are NOT Joe/Jane Average. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:43 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Wainstein agreed that the current AUMF does not adequately address current and future terrorist threats. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Speech #3 Jane Bambauer / Is Data Speech? [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  What does your analysis have to say about prior restraint? [read post]