Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 4,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2022, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 11th and Wednesday 12th October, the court will hear the Reference by the Lord Advocate of devolution issues under paragraph 34 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
The Court considered carefully the comments of the Court of Appeal in R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (No 8) [2002] EWCA Civ 932, [2003] QB 381. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
The Court considered carefully the comments of the Court of Appeal in R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (No 8) [2002] EWCA Civ 932, [2003] QB 381. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:44 am
By Tobias ThienelIt's a good day for human rights law because the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has today delivered its judgments in Al-Skeini and Others v United Kingdom, Al-Jedda v United Kingdom and Bayatyan v Armenia. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:45 pm
PF appealed to the House of Lords, although she did not pursue her complaints under Article 2. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm
The United States Department of Justice has decided that the company will not face charges. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:42 am
SmallThe interwebs have been abuzz this week with gleeful snarking about Sanches v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 10:02 pm
What one conceives well can be stated with clarity and the words to say it come easily. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1973 SC 2701; and Ranjit Thakur v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
The succinct test stated by Lord Rodger at [7] will be a useful starting point for first instance judges in cases where anonymity applications are made. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:00 am
The reasoning used by the Illinois Supreme Court seems to mirror that of the famed Lord Wilberforce, who in the UK House of Lords decision of Blathwayt v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
Lord Eassie went on to state at para. 48 of the Court’s judgment: “. . . we for our part do not see any reason why in ordinary, contemporary English usage ‘leave’ in this context should not simply connote a period in which the employee is free from work commitment. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Petrodell v Prest appeal to be heard by the Supreme CourtThe Court of Appeal, comprising Lord Justices Thorpe, Rimer and Patten, have given permission to Yasmin Prest to appeal to the Supreme Court against its decision in Petrodell Resources Limited v Prest [2012] EWCA Civ 1395. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am
At the time of the hearing we posted Lord Pannick’s speech on behalf of Mr Mosley. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
People v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:52 pm
George V lived closer to our own time. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
Dille v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:37 am
The concept is still rather wooly, but the approach remains that of Lord Bingham in M v Secretary of States for Work and Pensions [2006] 2 AC 91, encapsulated by Lady Hale as “the closer the facts come to the protection of the core values of the substantive article, the more likely it is that they fall within its ambit. [read post]
