Search for: "MATTER OF H D"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 3,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
The magistrate judge’s decision subsequently was vacated.The second significant event occurred with publication of the revisionist book by William D. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 5:01 am
While the judge “allege[d]” that the only explanation was his race, that fails to explain why people of every color are given similarly delicate and caring treatment. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 11:53 am
He also violated Mass.R.Prof.C. 8.4 (d) and 8.4 (h) when he submitted a false affidavit and gave false testimony in Court. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 12:30 am
Cahill’s Federal Fathers and Mothers was on my reading list for exams, and I’d recommend it to anyone thinking and writing about mid- and local-level bureaucrats. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:35 am
D. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
The matter then went to the Supreme Court of Ohio. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:21 am
” What mattered was whether the hirer “retains all necessary control” over its operations. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 11:37 pm
Better than an email with a soft touch “as a courtesy to you, I thought I’d let you know,” I like to share the post on Twitter with a hat tip to the relevant company person, ie, “title of post – source of post (name of your blog) url of post, h/t @wolters_kluwer. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Green, D. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:46 am
John Duffy is the Samuel H. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
So, I shall be printing out and carrying inside my red book a copy of s13, which provides (as well as directly amending s38(6) of the CA 1989) that : Control of expert evidence, and of assessments, in children proceedings (1)A person may not without the permission of the court instruct a person to provide expert evidence for use in children proceedings. (2)Where in contravention of subsection (1) a person is instructed to provide expert evidence, evidence resulting from the instructions is… [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Quality hypotheticals push the debate forward by stripping side issues away and getting to the heart of the matter. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 2:42 pm
For the purposes of discovery, it’s only important to know that ANY motion for discovery WILL toll the Speedy Trial Act until such time as the judge makes a final ruling on the Motion for Discovery. 18 USC 3161(h)(1)(D). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:12 am
A similar scenario set the stage for a decision of great interest last week by Suffolk County Commercial Division Presiding Justice Elizabeth H. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 6:18 pm
Cir. 1995) (en banc), aff’d 517 U.S. 370 (1996)) (text added).No Indication of Imprecision in ClaimBeginning with the claim language itself—as we must—there is no indication in the claim that 400 μm was intended to mean anything other than exactly 400 μm. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am
Mo. 1986) (noting relative risk of 3.89–3.92 for GBS from swine-flu vaccine), aff’d in part, 830 F.2d 831 (8th Cir. 1987)). [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:58 am
Paul Kelley, George Tazbaz, Roger D. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
(Recital 88, Article 44(1)(h)) This balancing test is in line with the Article 29 Working Party’s recent Opinion discussing the “legitimate interests” ground for data processing. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
(Recital 88, Article 44(1)(h)) This balancing test is in line with the Article 29 Working Party’s recent Opinion discussing the “legitimate interests” ground for data processing. [read post]
