Search for: "Mark Cover"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 18,212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2010, 2:07 pm
") Tisch says, at around the four minute mark:"The emergency regulation is what is expiring on October 8, reverting back to the old regulation. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 8:22 am
So far the following areas have been covered:* Trade marks, copyright and patents* Implications of the economic downturn for IP* Privacy* Outsourcing With thanks to James Mullan for bringing this to my attention via the BIALL blog. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:15 am
The event is the kick-off to a year of programs and celebrations marking the bicentennial. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 10:28 am
“The TTABlog” covered the ruling of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board that today’s Federal Circuit decision reviewed in a post titled “ZERO Not Generic for Soft Drinks, Says TTAB, In Multi-Mark Battle. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:06 am
On Thursday, June 11, 2015, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing for the purpose of marking up “the Innovation Act. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The annual report covers enforcement, inspections, sampling, recalls, Brexit, and food fraud. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 8:36 am
"Chief justice off mark on judges' earnings; Judicial pay shouldn't be tied to Congressional salaries": The Miami Herald contains this editorial today concerning Chief Justice Roberts' year end report that I covered here.2. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am
Robert Barnes covered the argument for The Washington Post, as did Mark Sherman and Sam Hananel for the Associated Press. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 12:56 am
According to the Brutts, Target had applied to register them in bad faith and/or was a "person who was an agent or representative of a person who was the proprietor of the trade marks" under the Trade Marks Act s.60(1). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
In February 2002 this mark was assigned to Gondwana which in June 2007 assigned the mark to Naazneen. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 3:26 am
Both the registration and the application covered publishing services, but the very low level of distinctive character of earlier mark led the Hearing Officer to the conclusion that there was no likelihood of confusion. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:36 am
And as a general rule, a prior user of a mark is entitled to a registration covering the entire United States, limited only to the extent that the junior user can establish that no likelihood of confusion exists and that it has concurrent rights in its actual area of use plus its area of natural expansion. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
Stuart considered that five years is not necessarily too long for a mark holder to claim a monopoly right if there is a genuine intention to use the mark. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 7:53 am
Instead, the appealed decision only compared the greater difficulties faced in assessing the distinctive character of a three-dimensional mark than of a word or figurative mark.A three-dimensional sign would be distinctive if it serves an origin identifier for the average consumer of the products covered by that mark, without “any detailed examination or comparison and without being required to pay particular attention”, as explained in Henkel… [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 8:48 am
both covering ‘perfumes’. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 1:32 am
It then held that the criteria for assessing the distinctive character of three-dimensional marks are no different than those applicable to other categories of marks. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:22 am
In doing this, the Board of Appeal did not assess Wine in Black’s mark as a whole and failed to take into account the fact that, even if the word ‘wine’ by itself was weakly distinctive in respect of the goods covered, the words ‘Wine in black’ had an imaginative and evocative character.* Since the colour black did not describe the organoleptic characteristics of wines, an expression meaning ‘Wine in black’ must be regarded as being… [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
., Aug. 28, 2013)A recent case from the First Circuit Court of Appeals, the federal court whose rulings cover Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Puerto Rico, demonstrates how important it is for business owners to register their trademarks as early as possible, and the consequences of not doing so.The case involves a dispute between two hotels over the right to use the mark “Meliá” in Puerto Rico. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
., Aug. 28, 2013)A recent case from the First Circuit Court of Appeals, the federal court whose rulings cover Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Puerto Rico, demonstrates how important it is for business owners to register their trademarks as early as possible, and the consequences of not doing so.The case involves a dispute between two hotels over the right to use the mark “Meliá” in Puerto Rico. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
., Aug. 28, 2013) A recent case from the First Circuit Court of Appeals, the federal court whose rulings cover Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Puerto Rico, demonstrates how important it is for business owners to register their trademarks as early as possible, and the consequences of not doing so. [read post]
