Search for: "Miller v. U.s"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,800
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2023, 3:33 pm
Michigan Asphalt Paving: The United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2006, 4:42 pm
In 1973, the Supreme Court attempted to define obscenity in Miller v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
, 296 F.3d 376, 378 (5th Cir. 2002)(quoting Miller v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
” In contrast, he continued, the “bureaucracy at the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 7:25 am
Koester v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In one case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:50 am
(Miller v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:16 am
Ever since the U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
The U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 6:26 am
Hinton v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
The court of appeals vacated the sentence, concluding that the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard by focusing on the nature of the offense and not whether the defendant was, within the meaning of Miller v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 10:53 am
Moore v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Lavoie, 475 U.S. 813, 825 (1986); see also Connally v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
"Miller-El v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 5:26 am
Trump v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 8:58 am
In the case, Skatteverket (Swedish Tax Agency) v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:13 am
The Federal Circuit noted that the law of broadening reissues was first developed by the Supreme Court in the 1881 decision Miller v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Supreme Court Case Miller v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 10:31 am
A grant would appear to be quite likely, because there is a definite conflict among the Circuit Courts on the meaning of the Second Amendment, and the Supreme Court has not ruled on the issue since a somewhat ambiguous decision in 1939 (U.S. v. [read post]
