Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 2061 - 2080 of 3,635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2013, 6:18 am by Joy Waltemath
Nor could the employee convince the court to revive his claim that his termination violated Oklahoma state law and was prohibited by Burk v K-Mart Corp. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:26 pm
 California Rule of Court 1.100 requires courts to grant accommodations to disabled people. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 10:38 am
In a case demonstrating the challenges of addressing aboriginal representation on Ontario juries, the Ontario Superior Court has rejected an application to have a sheriff found guilty of fraud, partiality or wilful misconduct over the lack of First Nations members on the panel.In R. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:15 am by Terry Hart
Challenge to streaming TV — Lyle Denniston of SCOTUSBlog reports on the cert petition filed by TV broadcasters asking the Supreme Court to review the Second Circuit’s decision in WNET v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
” Merpel had just read the latest judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the Patents Court, England and Wales, in Resolution Chemicals Limited v H Lundbeck A/S [2013] EWHC 3160 (Pat). [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:28 am by Maya Angenot
She also cited the 1917 Ontario Court of Appeal judgment of Campbell v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
Schepers, who became deaf and daft, and fantasized and testified to conversations with people, long dead, who could not contradict him. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 2:33 pm by National Indian Law Library
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: People v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 1:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
Supreme Court’s June decision in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 8:45 am by Ilya Somin
Unlike some other originalists, who defend the theory because they claim it is the only feasible way to interpret legal texts, McGinnis and Rappaport argue that originalism is superior to living constitutionalism because it produces better consequences, in the form of legal rules that benefit more people over time. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 5:08 pm
Upon motion of the prosecutor, and subject to constitutional limitation, the court in which an indictment, superior court information, prosecutor's information, information or simplified information charging a misdemeanor is pending: (b) may order the defendant to provide non-testimonial evidence. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:59 am
Like every other court in New York State, Supreme Court may not convict a defendant of a felony absent compliance with the indictment and waiver of indictment provisions in article I, § 6 of the New York Constitution as was held in People v Wiltshire. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am by Ken White
To its credit, the Supreme Court took only three years to correct itself in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]