Search for: "Plaintiffs Lead Counsel" Results 2061 - 2080 of 6,279
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am by Wolfgang Demino
. - San Antonio, Sep 13, 2017) One of the ways to defeat a debt collection suit is to have the Plaintiff's evidence excluded. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am by Wolfgang Demino
. - San Antonio, Sep 13, 2017) One of the ways to defeat a debt collection suit is to have the Plaintiff's evidence excluded. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:11 am by R. David Donoghue
”; The Court held that there was sufficient evidence for a jury to infer plaintiff or its counsel actives with intent to deceive by withholding material information and, therefore, denied the cross-motions on inequitable conduct grounds; and The Court denied plaintiff summary judgment on its false advertising claims because defendants claims that they were “the original quick disconnect stalk stomper” were susceptible to multiple reasonable… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
During plaintiff’s deposition, counsel for the defendants asked plaintiff the reasoning behind every absence that she took between April 2013 and April 2014. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:22 pm by Jonathan L. Israel
Apparently undeterred by these unfavorable results, the plaintiff in Livers and his counsel (who also represented the plaintiffs in Berger) seem to believe that the third time will be the charm. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 12:27 am by David Cheifetz
In passing: while I was practising in British Columbia, a few years ago, one plaintiff’s counsel, in closing submissions to the trial in a case I defending, told the trial judge that Farrant was still good law in BC because it hadn’t been specifically described as wrong, on this point, by the SCC; that is, not expressly overruled by the SCC. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:24 pm by William D. Kickham, Esq.
An injured plaintiff isn’t required to prove that the dog attacked someone previously, nor does the plaintiff have to prove that the dog has a vicious propensity. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:24 pm by William D. Kickham, Esq.
An injured plaintiff isn’t required to prove that the dog attacked someone previously, nor does the plaintiff have to prove that the dog has a vicious propensity. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Plus, for each case the company loses, it’s going to have to pay each plaintiff’s counsel reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:30 am by Scott Harman
The government urges that military detainees, “whose final disposition has not yet been determined” have never been held to have an “immediate right to access counsel. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:00 am by Michael Risch
It is a credit to Antonick and his counsel that the case progressed as far as it did. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
  He has served as lead counsel in over 200 appeals in state and federal courts across the nation and recently was elected a Fellow in the American Academy of Appellate Lawyers, an organization whose members have demonstrated the highest skill level and integrity in the practice of appellate law. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Even though the plaintiff had the resources to check on the status of service, plaintiff's counsel did not learn that the Writ was not served until after the statute of limitations expired. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 12:57 pm by mauragr5eeneGlawgroup
How does this limited time for filing impact plaintiffs and defendants? [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 8:46 am by Maura Greene
How does this limited time for filing impact plaintiffs and defendants? [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
There is no downside to reducing teen pregnancy—and the Trump Administration’s current claim that education and contraceptive access lead to sexually risky behavior is demonstrably false. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:00 am by CJ Haddick
The settlement negotiations themselves should likewise be documented, including notes following telephone calls and correspondence from your counsel to the Plaintiff’s counsel declining the demand, and more importantly, explaining the rationale for declining the demand, whether it be because liability is questionable, or the value of the injuries to not justify, based on your research, the amount of the settlement demand. [read post]