Search for: "Russell v State" Results 2061 - 2080 of 2,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Van Hook (09-144) United States Defense Department v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
In allowing the judicial review, Justice Russel accepted the argument relating to financial requirement. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:31 am by George M. Wallace
The Court's decision, in the case of Curious Theater Company v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:05 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (2d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Supplemental brief for petitioners Second supplemental brief for petitioners Amicus brief of the United States Case(s) involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 09-102 Title: Virginia v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 2:45 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
The remaining hurdle was the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Bowles v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:27 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
This is not an issue I wrote about, but it is worth reading Russell Beck's discussion on the Fair Competition Law blog of Specialized Technology Resources v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 5:17 pm by Will Aitchison
Servs., 616 F.3d 665, 681 (7th Cir.2010); Russell v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm by John Elwood
Denn 15-1234Issue: Whether a state's interest in “increas[ing] . . . information concerning those who support the candidates,” Buckley v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Nabiha Syed
Elsewhere, coverage looks ahead to Wednesday’s scheduled oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 08-1569 Title: United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Understanding the ADA, William Goren notes that the court’s opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Russell Spivak delivered a case summary of County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm by Elizabeth A. Bokermann, Esquire
 If your case is in a different state, the laws will differ. [read post]