Search for: "State v. Akins"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2006, 7:47 am
Niko v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:43 am
In People v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:59 am
It was also the subject of legal action, State of Washington v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 1:09 pm
The United Stated District Court of Arizona has just decided on the case of Blizzard Entertainment v MDY, and it's a doozy. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:43 am
In People v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Hassan Abdi and Afrah Khalaf [2010] EWHC 3083 (Admin) The Court of Appeal decided that time spent appealing against deportation counts in assessing whether an individual has been detained for an unreasonably long period. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
In Fisher v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
Native content is therefore less like traditional commercial speech, which does nothing more than propose a transaction, and more akin to the inextricably intertwined commercial/noncommercial line of cases discussed in Part II.C supra. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:16 am
Similarly, in Merit Construction Alliance v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:57 am
” In making this argument, the nursing home relied upon the “century-old precedent” of State use of Melitch v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:57 am
” In making this argument, the nursing home relied upon the “century-old precedent” of State use of Melitch v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 4:41 am
In D.A. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:57 am
” In making this argument, the nursing home relied upon the “century-old precedent” of State use of Melitch v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
There seems to be consensus that the act of offering or exposing copies for sale could not be considered as akin to putting copies into circulation. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
The case of Target Australia Pty Ltd v Catchoftheday.com.au Pty Ltd [2015] ATMO 54, decided in June, aimed to answer this question in the fair land of Australia. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 11:30 am
Recital 10 states that "protection is granted to the term 'Aceto Balsamico di Modena' as a whole. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:35 am
This week, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a sharply divided 4-3 opinion in Freshwater v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:48 am
Streaming royalties v radio remunerationIt has been noted in the Inquiry so far, that in some ways steaming can be akin to radio when the user passively listens to an algorithmic playlist, but it is different when the user makes their own selection. [read post]
