Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2017, 1:15 am
While injunctive relief is not automatic, we are a far way from Ebay v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 5:47 am
And again, this was just the first of the five UK technical trials in InterDigital v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
Here’s the best line in the Riley opinion: The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is “materially indistinguishable” from searches of these sorts of physical items… . [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 11:36 am
See R. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
Here’s the best line in the Riley opinion: The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is “materially indistinguishable” from searches of these sorts of physical items… . [read post]
12 May 2008, 1:34 am
The case is titled Guru Denim, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:54 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
First, the warrant lists certain items to be searched for without connecting those items to either of the two trailers or any one of the roughly four thousand vehicles on the Avery property. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:04 pm
” The major new case was the ground-breaking decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
They stated that Tilted Arc is entirely owned by the GSA and is displayed on government property. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:16 am
Although the decision by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 6:10 am
The district court stated:[Diamond] did not itemize any damages in discovery. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Huitson, R (on the application of) v Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 893 (25 July 2011): Revenue’s retrospective enforcement of rules preventing Isle of Man tax avoidance scheme not breach of human rights to property. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 2:22 pm
Genaust v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 2:22 pm
Genaust v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
In R v Edwards, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) set out a flexible framework with key questions to ask in assessing privacy interests.2 The non-exhaustive list of factors identified as instructive for the privacy analysis in Edwards is as follows: (i) presence [of the accused] at the time of the search; (ii) possession or control of the property or place searched; (iii) ownership of the property or place; (iv) historical use of the property or item;… [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
The carrier now has a sublimit of not more than 5% of the personal property limit for any one item. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:15 am
In State v. [read post]
