Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 2061 - 2080
of 29,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2007, 9:23 am
United States v. de Perez, No. 07-CR-361-1 (JBW), 2007 WL 3010587 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 2:22 pm
Baccicheti v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:31 am
The Ninth Circuit’s finding is an outlier among circuit courts in this respect, but it fits a broader trend to narrow the “catch-all” affirmative defense, particularly at the state level. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 11:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Public Disclosure Commission v. 119 Vote No! [read post]
23 May 2008, 7:28 am
Appeals Court Rules Strict Scrutiny Applies in "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Cases WITT V. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:14 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
Given this decision, it was considered at all levels in Barclay (No 1) that the Order in Council granting Royal Assent to the Law was amenable to judicial review in the courts of England and Wales. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:59 am
Notwithstanding the Court's citation of Ashwander v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:39 am
"
State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:10 am
ChanBond LLC, No. 17-1686 (What level of injury-in-fact is required to appeal of a PTAB IPR final decision?) [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
He put these exposure levels in the ‘same category’ as occupational levels. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:57 am
This paper assesses the possible effects on decision making about the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment if fMRI suggests that a patient in VS has some level of consciousness. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:50 pm
States. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am
” It is well established in cases from Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 1:36 pm
Today, design patent law is in the weakest and most confused state since before the Supreme Court’s landmark 1871 decision of Gorham v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:41 am
People v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
[Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am
Lord Tyre stated that this was an act of “reckless folly” which was not excused by Ms Jackson’s age (Ehrari v Curry [2007] EWCA Civ 120 distinguished). [read post]
