Search for: "US v. Davis"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 4,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
In two earlier columns (the second of which is here) we discussed McConchie v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Do we say, “Hey, you can’t do as many pushups as the rest of us, so you can’t help us repel the oncoming assault from thousands of enemy soldiers”? [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:43 pm
Davis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
The first is Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Davis: The Court must decide the following: Whether the subsection-specific definition of “crime of violence” in 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(3) (B), which applies only in the limited context of a federal criminal prosecution for possessing, using, or carrying a firearm in connection with acts comprising such a crime, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:27 pm
After Wal-Mart v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 9:44 am
The case was State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Jennifer Davis: class consciousness among judges in English law of 19th c. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 1:22 pm
Gyllenborg; affirming Judge Davis' dismissal of charges due to statutory speedy trial violationState v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:06 am
Realty Co., 23 AD3d 361, 361-362 [2d Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 705 [2006], cert denied 547 US 1207 [2006]). [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
The Court allowed a similar arrangement in Davis v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:29 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
By contrast, Davis sought to use Section 3 as a shield–as a defense in his criminal prosecution, and he could do so without enforcement legislation. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:39 am
This has already given us interesting and striking decisions from the Patents Court (also here) and the Court of Appeal in England, and also the US Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:54 pm
The amendments also address use of “enterprise value” instead of book value when applying review thresholds and extensions of the deadlines for national security reviews. ____________________ For more information about our regulatory services: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Parke Davis & Co., 520 F.2d 1359, 1362 (4th Cir. 1975). [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:55 pm
In today’s case (Davis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
Evans used five peremptory strikes in that trial, but there is no record of the race of the jurors whom he struck. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:07 am
The case is Gjuraj v. [read post]
