Search for: "United States v. Bush"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2008, 5:32 pm
" [6] President Bush stated the bill "is large enough to have an impact, amounting to more than $152 billion this year, or about 1 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:05 am
Bush and William J. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:33 am
Although the Supreme Court rejected the habeas-stripping provisions as unconstitutional in Boumediene v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Bush. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:01 am
Rejection of Nixon Precedent The court addressed the government’s reliance on a statement in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:01 am
Rejection of Nixon Precedent The court addressed the government’s reliance on a statement in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
United States for the proposition that there are limits to congressional impeachment authority where the president acts to remove a subordinate official. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
The obstruction charge does include a statement that the charged actions were “consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:00 pm
While accepting that there has been a shift from color-blind v. race-conscious to protect v. repair, Fleming and McClain query how “fundamental” this change is. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
The nation could thus be deeply divided, in a hard-to-resolve way, on the very basic question: Who is the (acting) president of the United States? [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
He is one of 51 Mexicans on death row in United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 9:30 am
Circuit ruled in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:53 pm
United States). [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:04 am
Woodley, 751 F.2d 1008, 1012-1013 (9th Cir. 1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986), and United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:00 am
United States on the fact that the activities at issue in those cases were ones in which the executive had traditionally engaged. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:49 am
The cases of Holder v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
United States, No. 11-1324 (D.C. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am
In Anderson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
State, __ Md. [read post]
