Search for: "United States v. Doe"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 44,299
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2023, 5:30 am
Norfolk Southern Railway in which the United States Supreme Court addressed the validity of Pennsylvania's consent by registration statute. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 3:50 am
In a report and recommendation dated September 11, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge James L. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 4:05 am
[T]he animating principle in New York Times v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
Worldwide, non-O157 STEC outbreaks emerged in the 1980s, and the first reported outbreaks in the United States occurred in the 1990s. [57, 55] The number of reported outbreaks due to non-O157 STECs remains relatively low in the United States, but experts agree that documented outbreaks probably represent the “tip of the iceberg. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:54 am
" In practice, it's hard to find cases where such a standard would likely change the outcome; but Thursday's Washington Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:16 am
As the Supreme Court put it in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
Case date: 07 September 2023 Case number: No. 22-2821 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:48 pm
For instance, in Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:20 pm
American Catalog Mailers Association v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:07 am
Susan V. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 5:47 am
Turning to recent actions, the July decision in SEC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:10 am
Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:47 am
[1] Garcoa, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
Importantly, today’s ruling does not impact NanoString’s legal ability to market or sell CosMx SMI products for protein detection in the European Union, nor does it impact the lawful selling of any NanoString CosMx SMI products in the United States, the United Kingdom or the rest of the world outside of the EU member states participating in the UPC system. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:42 am
Elzeftawy v. [read post]
