Search for: "United States v. State of Louisiana" Results 2061 - 2080 of 2,557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
The settlement resolves Plains’ Clean Water Act violations for 10 crude oil spills in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Kansas, and requires the company to pay a $3.25 million civil penalty. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:34 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit 2001) (Defendant stated in an internet chatroom `I will kill'), United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
Louisiana), national security (Boumediene v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:16 pm by Gideon
Just the say-so of a 44 year old woman, almost an entire lifetime after it allegedly occurred.1 Imagine, as Justice Douglas did, dissenting in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 4:42 am by Dianne Saxe
Section 1538(a) as well as BP’s lease with the United States, which requires that BP complies with all environmental statutes and regulations. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 7:29 pm by Frank Pasquale
United States District Court to justify their own decisions to hear the case. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm by lawmrh
Constitution, “The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:29 am by David Post
The plurality of four refused to revisit the Slaughter-House Cases (1873) or United States v. [read post]