Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 6,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 2:00 am
I came into the Byrd case vaguely inclined to favor Byrd's side -- I was on a cert petition on Byrd's side years ago -- but after reading the briefs I don't have a particular view of which side is right. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:21 pm
Don't prosecutors argue that defendants have acted in bad faith all of time based on far less circumstantial evidence? [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:49 am
Finally, we have appeals from two misdemeanor convictions. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm
After again finding that HIPAA didn't preempt the Stempler procedure, the court’s reasoning gets rather bizarre. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 1:55 pm
And many of these complaints should fail because they suffer from the same problem: they don't even seriously allege that the social media defendant played a meaningful role in the specific attack that killed the plaintiff's family member. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 2:11 am
That's the part I don't understand. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 2:22 pm
We can't really predict what later generations will think is most important. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 9:38 am
We're stuck with the current system, which is horribly unfavorable to defendants.2. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 7:55 pm
And the happy fact is that things don't have to be the way they are. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:58 am
So why don't the attorneys know the rules? [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:43 am
(And I still don't quite understand how you'd look at this session and highlight those bills!) [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:26 pm
" We must be certain that a defendant's voluntary acts are not mere "'litigation posturing'"—and that "the controversy is actually extinguished. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
" That's the "who cares about the state of the art" approach.Needless to say, we don't think either argument should fly.As to the first point, there's a lot of law out there holding that "violating" something that doesn't have the force of law isn't a basis for liability. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:30 am
I don't understand him to be saying just that Obergefell is wrong as a matter of constitutional doctrine but rather it is not in the common good to extend marriage to same-sex couples. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
We can't do the job properly. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:10 am
But if you do decide to partake, don't gamble on finding redemption in the First Amendment. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 5:04 am
I'll bet you wouldn't even accept it socially as a basis for judging other people. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:56 pm
But bills to punish Austin don't "count" more money spent on scientists or emergency med techs or 911 dispatchers as public safety money. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:33 pm
See You In Court. * If you have an axe to grind against a particular attorney who currently practices in the REGJB and want to label him or her the worst you ever saw, more than likely we will not post the comment, so don't bother or be prepared to sign your name and advocate why they should be included on the list. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
[[UPDATE: Don't blog when tired or in a hurry! [read post]
