Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me."
Results 2061 - 2080
of 7,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Last week, as readers of this blog surely know, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
Clemens (Del. 2000), LeClair v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:25 am
Tex., case no. 6:23-cv-00429): notice of related case Let me make a statement on an unrelated case: yesterday's post on the Optis v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
Earlier in the week, this Kat had the pleasure of participating in a public debate at the Baker & McKenzie premises in London on whether the Meltwater decision (see IPKat here) "marks the end of browsing as we know it". [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:24 pm
The last big preemption case, Watters v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm
This much was driven home to me by a speaker at the South African family law conference at which I attended as a speaker last week- where it is apparent that South Africa appears not to be compliant with the Hague Convention.The 1980 Hague Convention and the 1996 Hague Convention are conventions signed at The Hague in the Netherlands. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 6:13 am
I (or perhaps Steve V.) may have some update later if one of us is able to go. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:38 pm
” Judge Legg reported last week on Dinnena v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
See Koken v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:12 am
However it seems to me that to concentrate on procedural safeguards risks conflating assessing the essence of the right with assessing the legality of the interference with the right. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
It’s been three years since the 6th Circuit decided EEOC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
It’s been three years since the 6th Circuit decided EEOC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:33 am
This week’s “WIRTW” is all about looking ahead. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:38 pm
In the past, lawsuits filed by alleged harassers have been few and far between, but a new case filed against HSBC bank a few weeks ago in New York, plus few threatened lawsuits we have seen, make me wonder if this will be a new trend. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:38 pm
In the past, lawsuits filed by alleged harassers have been few and far between, but a new case filed against HSBC bank a few weeks ago in New York, plus few threatened lawsuits we have seen, make me wonder if this will be a new trend. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
