Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES" Results 2081 - 2100 of 44,303
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Importantly, today’s ruling does not impact NanoString’s legal ability to market or sell CosMx SMI products for protein detection in the European Union, nor does it impact the lawful selling of any NanoString CosMx SMI products in the United States, the United Kingdom or the rest of the world outside of the EU member states participating in the UPC system. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:02 am by jonathanturley
Feminists in the United States have also called for the end of the rule and the emphasis on a collective obligation as opposed to the intense individual autonomy model underlying the rule. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
"While it does not lie within the jurisdiction of the Board to enforce a contract between parties, Vaughn Russell Candy Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 1:38 pm by Lee E. Berlik
The right to have disputed facts determined by a jury, rather than a judge, is protected by both the United States Constitution as well as the Virginia Constitution. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 4:03 am
Applicant claimed acquired distinctiveness based on several years of use in the United States and sales representing some 17 million bars of soap, but the Board found the evidence insufficient. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 3:34 am by Kurt R. Karst
  Specifically, the statute would be amended to require NDA sponsors to: (i) certify to the Food and Drug Administration that the information described in subparagraph (B) that is submitted to the Secretary is complete and consistent with the information such sponsor or holder provided to the United States Patent and Trademark Office and any communications such sponsor or holder had with the United States Patent and Trademark Office; and (ii) (I) submit to… [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 10:02 am by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
Last month, the Sixth Circuit issued an important Fourth Amendment decision regarding searches of electronic devices, United States v. [read post]