Search for: "Does 1 - 38"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 4,958
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2017, 9:13 am
The report does say more drivers are testing positive for these drugs. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:30 pm
Moore, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 53, 2005 SCC 38). [read post]
16 May 2017, 9:07 am
App. 38 (1984). [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am
There just isn’t enough in this record to get us to bad faith under Din” (1:07:00). [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:08 am
The statute, however, does not define its term `use. [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:45 pm
Context 1 II. [read post]
12 May 2017, 7:06 am
OHA wote that “because Kingdomware decided the narrow question of whether task orders must be set aside for veteran-owned small businesses pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8127(d), Kingdomware does not affect SBA’s existing regulations pertaining to protests against task orders and recertification under long-term, multiple-award contracts. [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:16 am
Wis. 1991); Doe v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
The Supreme Court dismissed his appeal, on the grounds that “in the absence of any legislative definition of the constitutional offence of blasphemy, it is impossible to say of what the offence of blasphemy consists” ([1999] 4 IR 485, [2000] 1 ILRM 426, [1999] IESC 5 (30 July 1999) [38] (Barrington J)). [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:01 am
However, support for the decision could lie in Macmillan Inc v Bishopsgate Investment Trust (No 3), [1996] 1 WLR 387 (CA), which the court does mention (see for example para. 126), which stresses the possibility of characterizing a specific legal issue within the context of a broader claim. [read post]
8 May 2017, 12:43 am
However, document D2 did disclose such an automated use of the system in claims 35-38.The Board does not agree with the Examining division and offers the following catchwords:In determining what is made available to the public within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC by a prior art patent document, it must be borne in mind that it is the description which chiefly serves to disclose the invention in a manner that it may be carried out, whereas the chief function of the claims is to… [read post]
7 May 2017, 11:00 pm
They noted that the possibility of obtaining such an injunction comes from the law of equity and Section 2 (i.e. the six year limitation period for tortious claims) does not apply to pre-emptive injunctions based on section 36(1)(a). [read post]
6 May 2017, 10:11 am
J.A. 1780–81 ¶¶ 25,37–38 (emphasis added). [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:45 pm
’) (ECF No. 38), and the United States filed a reply (`U.S. [read post]
5 May 2017, 2:40 am
View more 1950s Strats here: http://goo.gl/uRJfKI 1 Mr. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:12 pm
Top 3 Kluwer Copyright Blog posts of March/April 1) Comments on the ‘value gap’ provisions in the European Commission’s Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (Article 13 and Recital 38) by Adj. [read post]
4 May 2017, 1:57 pm
Id. at 137–38. [read post]
2 May 2017, 4:30 am
"Issues in Mental Health Nursing, vol. 38, no. 4 (2017) [free full-text]- Special issue on "Immigrant and Refugee Mental Health. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 9:15 am
See J.A. 35(’303 Reexamination Certificate, col. 1 ll. 34–38). [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am
Then there are two scenarios: (1) defense counsel does not object and appellate counsel does not include the issue in the appellate brief; or (2) defense counsel does object and appellate counsel does not include the issue in the appellate brief.In scenario one, if the error was sufficiently egregious that any competent lawyer would object, then the defendant has an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim. [read post]
