Search for: "Does 1-51"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 3,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Given this, the fact an anti-PD-1 antibody is not made or tested in the priority document does not matter (para [125]). [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:59 pm
No.s 1-39 are here. 40. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
The judicial pecking order does not permit little peckers to overrule big peckers. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:10 pm
Kasich is asked about the $1 trillion student debt load. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:00 am
., 2015 NY Slip Op 07792, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe New York City Department of Education [DOE] appealed a decision by Supreme Court that [1] vacated the penalty of termination of a guidance counselor's employment imposed by DOE after a disciplinary hearing and [2] remanded the matter to DOE for a determination of a "lesser penalty” by a new hearing officer. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:40 am
Bill C-51. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:39 am
Bill C-51. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
Rptr.3d 199, 198 P.3d 1 (California Supreme Court 2008). [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:07 am
In FoodNet surveillance areas in 2008, the rate of Shigella was 6.6 per 100,000 population, exceeded only by Salmonella (15.2/100,000) and Campylobacter (12.7/100,000). [10] During 2006, public health officials reported a total of 1,270 foodborne-related outbreaks from 48 states in the U.S. [9] Although Shigella was responsible for only 10 (1%) of those outbreaks, 1 [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:32 pm
Pearce’s evidence:51. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:43 am
Based on the government's outlandish claim that the LA Times hack caused almost a million dollars in damages — more on that in a moment — Keys will likely face a recommended sentencing range of (by my calculation) 51-63 months as a starting point for sentencing arguments,1 and while the court may go considerably lower, it's very unlikely the court will go much higher. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:54 am
The rule is codified in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 51(b) and Federal Rule of Evidence 103(a) (1). [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 10:35 am
§ 51-2-7, as amended July 1, 1985. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:59 am
Dietze, 75 NY2d 47, 51 [1989], citing Terminiello v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
But does that matter -- in this case? [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:59 am
Baker, affirmed Judge Murphy's March 2014 Order awarding class counsel slightly over $1 million in fees and expenses. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
" (para 51)Article 3(1)(e)(ii) only refers to manner in which goods functionThe Court then turned to the third question and held that Article 3(1)(e)(ii) of the Trade Mark Directive, under which registration may be refused of signs consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result, must be interpreted as referring only to the manner in which the goods at issue function and it does not apply to the manner in… [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 8:51 am
") Published: 9/14/2015 11:51 AM [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 1:59 pm
Superior Court, 51 Cal. 4th 310, 246 P.3d 877 (2011), emphasized that “labels matter,” and “[i]n particular, to some consumers, the ‘Made in U.S.A. [read post]
