Search for: "English v. English" Results 2081 - 2100 of 11,207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2020, 11:00 am by Magdaleen Jooste
 If you have missed last week's exciting news, don't worry, this Kat have you covered...PATENTSUpdate in the Nokia v Daimler dispute! [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 9:48 am by Eric Goldman
” Courts Interpreting Emojis Citing the Oxford English Dictionary, the court defines an emoji as “a small digital image or icon used to express an idea, emotion, etc., in electronic communications. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:00 am by James Nurton
The Court’s unanimous judgment in the three cases (Unwired Planet International Ltd and another v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd and another, Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and another v Conversant Wireless Licensing SÀRL and ZTE Corporation and another v Conversant Wireless Licensing SÀRL [2020] UKSC 37) was issued today (August 26), after the Court heard arguments in October 2019. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:00 am by James Nurton
The Court’s unanimous judgment in the three cases (Unwired Planet International Ltd and another v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd and another, Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and another v Conversant Wireless Licensing SÀRL and ZTE... [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:05 am by Léon Dijkman
In sharp contrast, we have decided, for the reasons set out above, that the English court does have such a jurisdiction, even in the absence of consent by the parties, and it has of course exercised that jurisdiction in the Unwired case. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The defendants in the Conversant proceedings challenged the jurisdiction of the English court, raising issues (1) and (2). [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
FTDA cases do have slightly lower mean frequency v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 11:36 am by Bona Law PC
In plain English, a “smoking gun” in the form of documents, meetings or defendants’ testimony. [read post]