Search for: "Family Express Corporation"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 2,571
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2010, 6:55 pm
When this settlement was announced earlier this week, a Massachusetts Transportation Department spokesman expressed regret for Cila’s death. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
It nevertheless makes sense for the Dutch legislature also to provide for a domestic conflict of laws rule on the application of super mandatory rules, because not all areas of private law have been covered (as yet) by international instruments: notably parts of family law and the law of succession, the law of property, and of corporations. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:17 am
However, the corporate governance landscape has changed tremendously. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 12:36 pm
Putting her credit issues aside, I read the story of a woman abused by corporate behemoths; classic David and Goliath tales. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:28 pm
There was no express term contemplating layoff as in a collective agreement. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:30 am
” The dispute settled out of court with Princeton University agreeing to return an unprecedented amount of approximately $100 million to cover the Robertson family's legal fees as well as contribute to a new foundation set up by the Robertson family. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 5:15 pm
Tax reform also implies a reduction in the corporate income tax, and especially reductions in taxes on incomes of small businesses. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 5:27 pm
An investment adviser’s managerial role makes it essentially a corporate insider, said the SEC, and distinguishes it from a true secondary actor like an accountant, lawyer, or bank. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
He outlined the personal pressures of a libel action: expenses, time, bullying, and the effect on family and life. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
She sued on behalf of a putative New Jersey class for false advertising under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, breach of express and implied warranties, and unjust enrichment. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Born/Age: San Antonio, Texas / 43 years old Family: Married to Elizabeth Olea Garza for 20 years with two children (Mia 15 and Aric 13) Areas of practice: General Civil Litigation, Real Estate, Family, Corporate/Commercial Education: B.A. and J.D. from St. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
Following are some of the most important observations made by Justice Fisher: Absent express limitations in the by-laws, past practices can circumscribe the president's otherwise presumptive power to engage in transactions in the ordinary course of business only if (1) the practice "was developed by the corporate actors as a means of curtailing the president's presumptive power," or (2) the practice "was established by the… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
Note: the views expressed are my personal, a view point and I am aware of various connected issues on the subject. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
The House of Lords in the British Broadcasting Corporation case [2010] 1 AC 145 appeared to be in no doubt that Article 8 conferred a right to reputation that must be balanced, in an appropriate case, against the rights conferred by Article 10: see Lord Hope at [22] and [28] and Lord Brown at [69]. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:21 pm
They understood they were sharing detailed information about themselves and their families, and when they heard or read about social networks using that information in ways they didn't expect, they got upset! [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 11:18 am
You call President Eisenhower’s selection of Brennan as a nominee “rather cursory” and suggest that the President may have later expressed regret over his choice. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
Joshi Amba Shankar Family Trust & Ors. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
The boilerplate section of many corporate agreements include a “governing law” provision. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 4:00 am
Senior was represented by a partner at Devine, Markovits & Snyder, a small Albany law firm specializing in family law. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:45 am
In commentary for CBS’s BNET, Jim Edwards expresses concern that a ruling in favor of the Bruesewitz family will “plunge the judicial system down a science-free rabbit hole. [read post]
