Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 2081 - 2100 of 10,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2007, 9:38 pm
There is no significant data on RCEs presented in the article.#2. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:53 am
 This Kat wonders whether all this may mean that the "bio" section of one's Twitter account is bound to become an actual "legal disclaimer" section about (1) Who you are NOT; (2) What you do NOT do; (3) Who/What you do NOT endorse. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am by Glenn R. Reiser
MacKay, II, 2 New Jersey Business Corporations § 14-6(d)(1) (2d ed. 1996).In Lavene v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 8:04 am by John Jascob
CII notes that the proposed rule does not identify any circumstances in which forfeiture, downward adjustment or clawback is mandatory. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
’” Johns Hopkins Univ. v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:55 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
 To hear the Podcasts, click 'Launch Echoplayer' on the links below to play video, slides and audio: Legal Theory and Legal History: A neglected dialogue - Keynote 1 Professor Quentin Skinner, The Concept of the State in Legal History and Theory Legal Theory and Legal History: A neglected dialogue - Keynote 2 Professor John Bell, Is Comparative Law Necessary for Legal Theory? [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:31 am
 When: October 20, 2021, 15:00-16:30 CET  02:00 PM in London)Language: English & French (interpretation in both languages provided)Moderator: Lisa Reilly, Executive Director, GISFPanelists: (1) Chris Galvin, Head of Communications & Outreach, ICoCA; (2) Juliette Jourde, Research & Outreach Assistant, ICoCA/GISF; (3) Elodie Leroy-Le Moigne, Plan International, Global Security Advisor; (4) Fodeba Diallo, Red Cross, Côte d’Ivoire, Safety and Security… [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:15 am
Therefore, E GAR is merely descriptive in association with Applicant’s goods in that it immediately conveys knowledge of features or characteristics of those goods, that is, that they are electronic cigars.And so the Board affirmed the Section 2(e)(1) refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: WYHA? [read post]