Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 13,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2021, 7:33 am
” (Note that the second—what’s material to consumers—is a matter of consumer reaction, but one that people in the industry might be particularly able to know in general.) [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 6:46 am
A scuffle broke out and the candidate was escorted into an SUV.Here's the raw (pun intended)CW: f-bombs@SpecNews1SoCal pic.twitter.com/FeFx3wnuSD— Kate Cagle (@KateCagle) September 8, 2021 The WSJ piece points us to Kyle Smith's piece in National Review: "Why Isn’t the Attack on Larry Elder the Biggest Story in America? [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 7:28 am
” But literal falsity doesn’t necessarily entail materiality. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 11:58 am
While Manchin's defenses of the filibuster have been embarrassing efforts that would earn at best a B-minus in any undergraduate course, his pose as a sober centrist on fiscal matters is terrible in a slightly different way. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 10:38 am
Protection While indemnification provisions may be seen as protective of a nonprofit’s agents, if a nonprofit doesn’t have the resources to provide such indemnification, the provisions may not be protective at all. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 9:40 am
” Berkheimer, 881 F.3d at 1368. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:25 am
Citing Matter of Kenny v DiNapoli, 11 NY3d 873, the Appellate Division observed that "[f]or purposes of the Retirement and Social Security Law, an accident is defined as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact" and "an injury that results from the performance of ordinary employment duties and is a risk inherent in such job duties is not considered accidental. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:25 am
Citing Matter of Kenny v DiNapoli, 11 NY3d 873, the Appellate Division observed that "[f]or purposes of the Retirement and Social Security Law, an accident is defined as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact" and "an injury that results from the performance of ordinary employment duties and is a risk inherent in such job duties is not considered accidental. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 3:31 am
Rigney & Co., 247 F. 407, 410 (2d Cir. 1917). [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
These provisions don’t have a private right of action. 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am
Proceedings related to the Decedent were first pursued in the action encaptioned In the Matter of the Estate of Ralph Sandor, Deceased, Docket No. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
IN THE MATTER OF THEESTATE OF ANN GRISCHUK,Deceased.___________________________ Submitted January 11, 2021 – Decided July 27, 2021 Before Judges Sabatino and DeAlmeida. [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 6:25 am
These issues would all be irrelevant to the subject matter of their testimony. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 10:22 am
With services, though, matters were less clear, and the court found that omission claims shouldn’t be dismissed. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 7:01 pm
Cherry, 422 F. 3d 540 This feels pretty easy to prove. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 1:29 pm
[h]e couldn’t control himself. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 1:29 pm
[h]e couldn’t control himself. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 5:35 am
Key Findings The Biden administration’s budget proposals have several provisions focused on raising taxes on the U.S. fossil fuel industry. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
The Third Circuit didn't exactly reject the Teneyuca factors, but did note concern raised in other contexts that "[t]oo often the factors in a checklist . . . result[] in rote following of a form containing factors where courts tally up and spit out a score without an eye on the principles. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
The Third Circuit didn't exactly reject the Teneyuca factors, but did note concern raised in other contexts that "[t]oo often the factors in a checklist . . . result[] in rote following of a form containing factors where courts tally up and spit out a score without an eye on the principles. [read post]
