Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2016, 4:30 am
When a judge uses a non-standard phrase to explain a decision, it sends us into a tizzy. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm
“Meaningful” opposition—not the right standard. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:57 pm
” See Kernan v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:56 am
Justice Scalia used it in his concurring opinion in Skilling v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:33 pm
Another good example is that controversial Roe v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 9:59 am
(Compare Bowman v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:23 am
(This makes sense since, as we have written before, Emory’s Open Expression Policy incorporates at least the same substantive standards that the First Amendment imposes on public universities, so that the Emory Community has at least the same rights as the communities of the University of Georgia or Georgia State University.) [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:18 pm
The judge made the firearm finding and applied a sentence enhancement for use of a firearm. [read post]
6 May 2016, 1:50 pm
They made it a standard move, and it became second nature over time. . . . [read post]
6 May 2016, 11:23 am
POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:42 am
Citing Rodman v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:02 pm
As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
YouTube v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm
Intermediate v. strict scrutiny standard: but that’s one of the principal disputes right now. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
” Id. at *13 (citing Medtronic v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 2:35 am
Others might use them interchangeably. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 7:10 pm
Bell v Metro. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:45 am
Again, Cheng is correct insofar as he suggests that statisticians do not often use use absolute probabilities. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 6:47 am
Yet that was precisely the situation Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole A. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am
Wednesday’s Supreme Court ruling in Bank Markazi v. [read post]