Search for: "Petition of Smith" Results 2081 - 2100 of 3,020
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2011, 2:45 pm by Marty Schwimmer
This is a guest post by my colleague, Elizabeth Barnhard: Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249), which makes major changes to the U.S. patent system. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:12 am by Joseph Falcon
On September 8, 2011, members of the United States Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) with a vote of 88-9, without amendment to the House bill passed in late June. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:20 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
A petition must be filed within one year (or 364 days?) [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
   Since renamed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act was passed by the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:23 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The circuit concluded Smith abrogated Remmer in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:48 am by Stefanie Levine
Post-grant review under chapter 32 may also be granted on the additional ground that the petition raises a novel or unsettled legal question that is important to other patents/applications. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:48 am by Stefanie Levine
Post-grant review under chapter 32 may also be granted on the additional ground that the petition raises a novel or unsettled legal question that is important to other patents/applications. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 2:40 pm by Raymond Millien
Senate voted to adopt the June 23, 2011, House of Representative’s version of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, advancing it to President Obama’s desk, who has indicated he will sign it into law. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 9:43 am by Vincent LoTempio
The Leahy-Smith "America Invents Act" H.R. 1249, was passed by the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:53 pm by Justin E. Gray
[8] See, e.g., inter partes reexamination 95/000106 (2007-06-27 Petition Decision, pp. 7-8). [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm by Stephen Jenei
The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, H.R. 1249, which passed the House in June by 304-117 in June, contains a provision to amend 35 U.S.C. 156, the statute governing patent term extensions. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:22 am by Marie Louise
(Kluwer Patent Blog) Fortical (Calcitonin-salmon) – US: Obviousness in chemical formulations: (unclaimed) purpose of limitation leads to nonobviousness holding: Unigene Labs. and Upsher-Smith Labs v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:30 pm by Stephen Jenei
  The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, H.R. 1249 passed the House in June by 304-117, in June. [read post]