Search for: "Petition of Thomas" Results 2081 - 2100 of 4,010
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  We should simply eliminate successive state habeas petitions and federal habeas review for any claim that does not go to actual innocence. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Constitutional Law Found., 525 U.S. 182, 209 (1999) (Thomas, J., concurring in the judgment) (treating a law as content-based because “the category of burdened speech is defined by its content—Colorado’s badge requirement does not apply to those who circulate candidate petitions, only to those who circulate initiative or referendum proposals”). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:33 am by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Thomas asked why the statute couldn’t be seen as a new eligibility requirement. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:54 am by Eric Turkewitz
(And it was on the 4th in 1826 that Adams and Thomas Jefferson both passed into the next world.) [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:21 am
  A petition for rehearing en banc was denied, but yielded a forceful dissent. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:38 am by Robin Shea
” Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Kennedy, Scalia, and Thomas. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:52 am by Christine Bechtold
“In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:22 pm by Ron Miller
Justice Scalia filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Chief Justice Roberts joined, as well as justices Thomas and Alito. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
This part of the decision is five to four, with Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Anthony M. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:07 am by Lyle Denniston
” Technically, and beyond the sometimes severe rhetoric, this is what the decision in six separate petitions (the lead petition was Utility Air Regulatory Group v EPA) actually held: First, EPA may not move to regulate all forms of greenhouse gas emissions just because it has authority to do that in some contexts — such as emissions from the tailpipes of automobiles and trucks. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
  The petitioner didn’t depart completely empty-handed though:  Justice Scalia, joined by Justice Thomas, awarded a consolation prize, a dissent from the cert. denial arguing that the Court should grant the petition or GVR it in light of Town of Greece v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:06 am by Sandra Park
Justice Thomas, writing for a unanimous Court (as he did last Term in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 5:58 am by Alfred Brophy
But that is coming to an end after the university’s Board of Trustees voted to revert the building to its original name, East Residence Hall, after petitions from the student body urged the school to re-evaluate the former governor’s legacy. [read post]