Search for: "State v. So" Results 2081 - 2100 of 117,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 2:07 pm by Brett Trout
” In reaching this conclusion, the Copyright Office relies on the case of Naruto v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:52 am by Brian Clark
United States, 432 F.2d 1052, 1055 (3d Cir. 1970) [17] The Stalker Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Of course, the states had every legal right to refuse the federal money, so it is hard to see the coercion. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
 ReputationThe Court began by noting that although market share was a relevant factor, there was no requirement for a mark to be known by a specific percentage of the relevant public, nor for its reputation to cover all the territory concerned, so long as that reputation exists in a substantial part of that territory (QUARTODIMIGLIO QM, T-76/13 EU:T:2015:94).Furthermore, in order to establish whether a mark has a reputation, an overall assessment must be carried out of the evidence… [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
And, where it is found, the state should be compelled to ensure such misconduct is addressed so it is no longer a factor. [read post]