Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 29,083
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2015, 7:19 am
The Texas Supreme Court asked the Hyders to respond to Chesapeake’s motion for rehearing in Chesapeake v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:40 am
(Eugene Volokh) The Supreme Court has just agreed to review EEOC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 12:55 pm
The application asked the Chief Justice to delay his transfer until after the Supreme Court decides two cases (Boumediene v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
The Washington Supreme Court issued a decision today in Morgan v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
The Washington Supreme Court issued a decision today in Morgan v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
In Cohen v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:22 pm
The case was Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:26 am
Bank National Association v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:47 am
Since any judgment of the Court of Appeal would necessarily be given some time after that, it could well be the case that, whereas this Court currently has jurisdiction to make a reference, the Court of Appeal would not have jurisdiction to do so. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
On 7 June 2023, Mr Justice Marcus Smith handed down judgment with his FRAND determination.[1] This is the second judgment issued by the English Courts containing a substantive FRAND determination since the pivotal judgment of the UK Supreme Court in 2020 in Unwired Planet (the first being the judgment of Mr Justice Mellor in InterDigital v Lenovo earlier this year). [read post]
14 May 2008, 4:27 pm
HORVATH V. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:34 am
" In the book he attacks the Second Amendment decision in D.C. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
WAXMAN: Well, six JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: Shouldn’t we overrule it? [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
Two separate challenges were before the court on Tuesday, but the justices spent most of their time and energy on the first case, which is known as Biden v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:31 am
Justice Elena Kagan joined the fray as well. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
On the legal issues alone, Miller represents a significant decision on the prerogative of Parliament and Government to alter the rights of British citizens and it could well be the case that defines the Supreme Court for years to come. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Remember that day’s Espinoza v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
Randy’s argument is more or less the one Justice Scalia makes in his concurring opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:41 am
” These are the criteria identified by Chief Justice Roberts in his opinion for the Court in Rucho v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
There the Supreme Court held that the Constitution affords states immunity in state courts as well as federal ones. [read post]
