Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. WASHINGTON"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 4,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
California Appellate Districts, November 20, 2007 Garretson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm
Giles v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
Based on the California Supreme Court's recent ruling in People v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am
Harris and Kurns v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 449 U.S. 1039, 1041-42 (1980) (White, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (arguing that denial of political subdivision standing was "inconsistent" with the Court's holding in Board of Education v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
As the California Supreme Court stated in Cobbs v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 12:27 pm
As the Washington Post reports, the D.C. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 5:50 pm
In Wills v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUDocket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU Docket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:39 am
The civil law suit, Beaty v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 8:15 am
The second case is Butler v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 12:58 pm
” (Washington v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 5:48 am
Washington v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 2:00 am
The Washington Post reports that a misunderstanding at an after-school tennis practice in California has culminated in a $5.7 million civil judgment against two attorneys who were formerly husband and wife. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 2:00 am
The Washington Post reports that a misunderstanding at an after-school tennis practice in California has culminated in a $5.7 million civil judgment against two attorneys who were formerly husband and wife. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 4:22 pm
See, e.g., California Civil Code §§ 1798.100, 1798.140(b). [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:39 am
(On the other hand, the Court also said that, as part of its narrow-tailoring obligation, colleges and universities “can and should draw on the most promising aspects of . . . race-neutral alternatives [in states like California, Florida, and Washington where the consideration of race was prohibited by state law] as they develop. [read post]
