Search for: "CF-3"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2010, 7:10 pm
See particularly footnote 3 of the Alito dissent (which Roberts joined): The main reason for the interviews was to inquire about the gifts, and the proffer shows that the jurors who were interviewed discussed this matter. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:07 pm
This bridge is considered insufficient by the Board:[…] In the Board’s judgment, the closest prior art is represented by paragraphs [0002], [0003] and [0005] of the patent specification, from which the claimed process differs in that gore strips are applied parallel to a longitudinal axis of the aircraft fuselage section and the polymeric matrix composite material is applied transversely thereto. [3.4.2] The [patent proprietor] has shown, in particular in paragraphs [0026] to [0041] of… [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
May 21, 1996); cf. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:36 am
Das BGer unterwirft den Ferienanspruch derselben Verjährungsregeln wie finanzielle Ansprüche aus dem Arbeitsverhältnis (OR 128 Ziff. 3, fünf Jahre), sieht also keinen Raum für eine gesonderte, zehnjährige Verjährungsfrist für den Ferienanspruch:"Le Tribunal fédéral a laissé ouverte la question de savoir si le délai de prescription est de cinq ou de dix ans (art. 127 ou art. 128 ch. 3 CO; cf. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm
The same conclusion applies to current claims 1 to 3 according to the current sole request on file, the subject-matter of which partly overlaps with the subject-matter of the claims granted in relation with the parent application. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:17 am
In sum, its applicability is generally a question for the trier of fact (People v Lemmons, supra, pp 511-512), as is the applicability of the exception for a weapon found on the person (see People v Lemmons, supra, p 511; cf. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
Cf. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:34 am
MST, 3:00 a.m. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
Cf. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Cf. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:09 pm
Las cuestiones de fondo (muchas) aparecerán cuando se vayan discutiendo actos concretos de la autoridad de aplicación.3. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:37 am
(finding defendant's possession of 76 images relevant); (3) whether the content of the images "was evident from their file names," United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 11:22 am
We blogged about Abdullahi here. 3. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
Cf. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:24 am
Cf., e.g., City of Norwood v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:07 pm
A new working paper which may interest blog readers is Steve L. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
Cf. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:23 am
Thomson-CFS v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 10:49 am
T 999/93 [3] and, for an Opposition Division, T 390/86 [7]). [read post]
