Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 34,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2022, 5:45 pm
The court effectively ignored two California federal court cases cited by OppFi, Sims v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:38 am
According to last month’s released results, California examinees scored 17 points higher on the Multistate Bar Examination than the national mean (1428 v. 1411 scaled points). [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 8:01 am
In Reyes v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 9:45 pm
In Conway v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 1:34 pm
The Pliva, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 8:47 am
Background: The case is Pena v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 9:23 am
The California Supreme Court’s opinion in Howard v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:39 pm
County of El Dorado may impact California law moving forward. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
In People v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:01 pm
Our ongoing coverage of this case, DFEH v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:59 am
More reactions to the Supreme Court’s 5-4 Brown v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 9:24 pm
And neither, apparently, does the California Court of Appeal. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:16 pm
Foreseeability (California law), Negligence, Tort:California law places greater weight on the element of foreseeability in the duty analysis than does Maryland law. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:30 am
The case of FLIR Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:00 pm
Avi Casino Enterprises and California v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm
The 1985 California Court of Appeal decision in Loral Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 8:11 am
Bonta, the constitutional challenge to California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:00 am
In Department of Finance v Commission on State Mandates,* the Court ruled in favor of public agencies subject to storm water discharge permits, holding that State-mandated storm water permit provisions exceeding federal law requirements may be reimbursable State mandates under Article XIII B, Section 6, of the California Constitution. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
The California Supreme Court yesterday issued its ruling in Coito v. [read post]