Search for: "Does 1 - 10" Results 2101 - 2120 of 43,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2018, 12:49 pm by The Law Offices of Jeffrey C. Pettys
The existence of a pre nuptial agreement does not affect or invalidate the terms of the I-864 Affidavit of Support. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:50 am by Guru Immigration
However, a lower percentage rate of denial does not necessarily mean that this waiver is easy to get. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am by Jessica Kroeze
"Dependent claims 2 to 10 are directed to more specific embodiments of the composition according to claim 1.III. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:10 am by Sam E. Antar
 He does not know when to stop blabbing away, misleading investors, and lying to the media – even during an ongoing SEC investigation of his antics.?? [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court explained that Teacher had more than 10 days before he offered testimony with respect to those charges, and he did not object to DOE's request for consolidation of all of the charges against him. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:20 pm by Hani Sarji
  Janet Novack (Executive Editor, Forbes) argued for DIY wills: (1) Deborah L. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:08 pm by James P. Yudes, Esq.
  New Jersey Court Rule 1:10-3 provides a vehicle for the Payee to seek enforcement of support orders through an application for the ”Enforcement of Litigant’s Rights” and provides a plethora of coercive vehicles to a court to compel compliance with court ordered support obligations. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:08 am by Jon Sands
" The 9th compares 288(c)(1) with sexual abuse of a minor, and finds that 288(c)(1) does not contain the element of "sexual abuse. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 4:59 pm by Tung Yin
Like most private employers, mine does not give Presidents' Day off. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:02 pm by imlablog
UPDATE: The Supreme Court dismissed this case after both parties agreed to dismiss on February 10, 2012. [read post]
Effective as of October 5, 2021, Int. 2397-2021 requires operators of “transient hotels” (as defined by Section 12-10 of the New York City zoning resolutions) to pay their employees severance pay if: (1) the hotel closed to the public and has not, by October 11, 2021, recalled at least 25% of the number of employees it employed as of March 1, 2020 and has not reopened to the public by November 1, 2021; or (2) the hotel underwent a mass layoff after… [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 11:01 am by oliver randl
Thus, the main request does not meet the requirements of A 83. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:01 pm by Joel S. Barras
As with Alaska, the law does not impact an employer’s prohibition of marijuana use. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 3:53 pm by Josh Blackman
["Section Three does not expressly (1) apply to future rebellions or insurrections, (2) apply to persons elected as President of the United States, (3) apply to persons seeking to qualify as a candidate for the Presidency, or (4) indicate whether the enforcement of Section Three requires the passage of enabling legislation. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:30 pm
The court's reasoning can be found here and here (Justice Scalia).10-1-2008 Washington DC:The Supreme Court yesterday declined to revisit its June decision that imposing the death penalty on child-rapists is unconstitutional, although two justices said they would have reopened the case and two others sharply criticized the majority. [read post]