Search for: "Files v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 2101 - 2120 of 3,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm by Amy Howe
The government’s recommendation in Bank of America v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm by Schachtman
In his graduate thesis, Historicizing the Forensification of History: A Study of Historians as Expert Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation in the United States of America (Univ. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am by John Elwood
United States and Yates v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:23 am
Miller, a citizen of the United States and the State of Michigan, is and a former professional hockey player. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:32 am by Greg Mersol
  At  the time the suit was filed, the Ninth Circuit authority was unfavorable to their enforcement, but by the approval hearing the United States Supreme Court had rendered its decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
29 May 2014, 6:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the Supreme Court resolves two clashing principles: the right to speak your mind and protest before government officials, and the need to protect the President of the United States from assassination.The case is Wood v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:27 am by Jon Gelman
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ JAY BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
United States Department of Justice Judicial Watch’s request was filed under FOIA, a federal law that took effect in 1967. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]