Search for: "Head v. State"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 13,579
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2010, 11:55 pm
Part III also briefly states the theoretical basis for a comparative analysis of exactions. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:49 am
Their son was killed in a head-on car accident in Brookhaven, Long Island. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 2:44 pm
In the case of Clauss-Walton v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 6:24 am
In its landmark 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
In Landor v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Sharre Tefila Congregation v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 9:30 pm
The Court did so because the Justices sought to head off sectional conflict over fugitive slaves. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
At oral argument counsel noted that in Oncale v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:21 am
" An article in Teledifusora Insular states that Mr. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 2:03 pm
By Herron Bond In Mackey v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 6:54 pm
The case, Garvey v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:57 am
No doubt, there is a sense here that the Court is not interested in technicalities that would force all of these types of disputes to be brought before it rather than knocked on the head in the Office. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:39 am
Rudyard Kipling, writing in 1891, noted how he ...came upon a bar-room full of bad Salon pictures, in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 7:42 am
Regardless, however, Chris has done more and better work on this subject than anyone I know, and the Slate piece is very good. * For an example of its being done "wrong," see this story, which involves my own state of Alabama and Twinkle Cavanaugh, the head of the state's Public Service Commission and a living reminder that all that twinkles is not gold. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
We can’t fall for this head fake. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:09 am
At Reuters, Lawrence Hurley reports that during Wednesday’s argument in Maslenjak v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 9:35 am
As always, SCA cases make my head hurt, and this one is no exception. [read post]
