Search for: "JUSTICE DEPT." Results 2101 - 2120 of 3,152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Hopping, 171 AD2d 63 (2d Dept 1991), upon which the lower court principally relied, was "more precise" than the provision in the Teutuls' letter agreement [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 6:26 pm by Phillips & Cohen
And it seems as though its use will be increasing.Thus far in 2010 the Dept. of Justice has carried out a dozen prosecutions, after 19 prosecutions in 2009. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:47 pm
Better get rid of any "Fritz the Cat" videos you downloaded.I read the press release from the US Justice Dept. trying to decipher the real reason they brought this prosecution... [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:38 pm
Actually the Dept. of Justice directive under Attorney General Eric Holder says that prosecuting medical marijuana is not a priority but that prosecuting non-medical use remains a priority. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 3:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Cohen, Supreme Court, New York County, Justice Edmead 2009 NY Slip OP 30806(U), April 15, 2009 illustrates two distinct principals in the area of attorney-client privilege. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:08 pm by Mandelman
The New York Times is reporting that: “Representative Pelosi, the House speaker, and 30 other Democratic representatives from California told the Justice Department, the Federal Reserve and the comptroller of the currency that “it is time that banks are held accountable for their practices. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
" Justice Driscoll's ruling skips over the respondents' procedural objection to reach the substantive issue. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Furthermore, the Court has exercised its interest of justice jurisdiction to modify judgments to eliminate improperly imposed DNA fees even where counsel failed to timely object. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) A reader writes, with the subject “I’m puzzled,” Not a single word on The Volokh Conspiracy wrt the accusations against the Civil Rights division of the Justice Dept. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Singletarly v NYC Dept. of Homeless Services, Supreme Court IA PART 27, Justice Gammerman, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports] In the Singletarly case Judge Gammerman sets out the basic rules concerning the rights of a provisional employee... [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:55 am by uwlegalscholarship
Boston University School of Law presents a lecture and symposium on Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ganea, 41 AD3d 54 (2nd Dept, 2007) "22 NYCRR 1215.1, otherwise known as the "letter of engagement rule," was promulgated by joint order of the appellate divisions, and applies to all civil actions where the amount in controversy is $3,000 or more. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Court of Appeals in Washington [CADC] granted the Obama administration's motion to allow the funding from the National Institutes of Health to continue while the government appeals a judge's order that blocked the research.from Court: Stem-cell funds can keep flowingSee previous IPBiz posts:http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2010/09/dept-of-justice-seeks-stay-of-stem-cell.html : [ Dickey-Wicker amendment ] "I was stunned": Collins doing his best Captain Renault? [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:47 pm by almaraz
Reeves, Oregon Dept. of Justice Trial Division Jed Tomkins ‘06, Multnomah County Attorney’s Office The program was held at Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, Oregon on September 13, 2010. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
James, 71 AD 238 (1st Dept 1902) (plaintiff, as a stockholder, would be invested with cause of action on failure of receivers to bring action to redress wrong alleged in complaint). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:30 pm by Kent Scheidegger
During the oral argument of Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:24 am by ADeStefano
In a two-judge dissent, Justice McGuire observed that the Court's prior holding in Ryan v. [read post]