Search for: "Jones v. District Court"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 3,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2011, 7:20 am
(Eugene Volokh) The case is Sabol v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:21 am
Emanuel v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
Whether the rational basis standard of review should be used to evaluate DOMA is also before Judge Barbara Jones of the Southern District of New York in Windsor v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
Supreme Court, in Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
See Jones v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
See Jones v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:14 am
However, the District Court did acknowledge that the Supreme Court in Dastar Corp. v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp (2003) ( a subsection section (A) case) held that 'origin' refers to "the producer of the tangible goods that are offered for sale, and not the author of any idea, concept or communication embodied in those goods. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Jones, E.C. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Richard Mills, District Judge. * Opinion by Judge Mills. * The Honorable Richard Mills, United States District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:03 pm
The district court dismissed, finding that personal jurisdiction was not proper. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:08 pm
Here's Judge Edith Jones, writing for herself and four other conservative 5th Circuit judges, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc in Fisher v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
" According to the indictments unsealed today in White Plains federal court: A 21-count indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
" According to the indictments unsealed today in White Plains federal court: A 21-count indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
" According to the indictments unsealed today in White Plains federal court: A 21-count indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
" According to the indictments unsealed today in White Plains federal court: A 21-count indictment, United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:21 am
(I say 'rightly or wrongly', because the central holding of those cases was not as broad as many thought at the time: see Jones v Ministry of the Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2006] UKHL 26, [2007] 1 AC 270, paras 86 et seq). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:14 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, arguing the ban violates the First Amendment. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Koerner & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Koerner & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
