Search for: "K. B. R."
Results 2101 - 2120
of 5,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Moreover, it was held that claims 6 to 8, the features of which are now present in claims 1, 5 and 6, did not fulfil the requirements of R 43.However, the impugned decision is not based on grounds of which objections of non-compliance with A 84 and R 43 form part.[9] As already found in decision T 1640/06, objections that do not form part of the grounds for a refusal of an application, in particular objections in obiter dicta, can be meant as voluntary information to an applicant… [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
Curran, Ryan K. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:54 am
Gráinne de Búrca The EU Constitution of Social Governance in an Economic Crisis: In Defence of a Transnational Dimension to Social Europe Dagmar Schiek Withdrawal from the European Union: A Typology of Effects Phedon Nicolaides Reconciling Different Legal Spheres in Theory and Practice: Pluralism and Constitutionalism in the Cases of Al-Jedda, Ahmed and Nada Christina Eckes and Stephan Hollenberg Translation in the EU: Language and Law in the… [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:09 am
And Now -- A Word About K&R: As part of my work in the management liability insurance arena, I am frequently called upon to help with the placement of kidnap and ransom (K&R) insurance. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 7:17 am
These are found in Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm
Historical Perspective Timeline of Key Studies and Regulatory Changes for Cheeses Made from Raw Milk 1941-1944: Typhoid fever epidemics are linked to cheddar cheese made from raw milk in Canada; outbreak-related Salmonella typhi strains are recovered from 30-day-old cheese, but not from 48- or 63-day-old cheese resulting in Alberta, Canada halting the sale of raw milk cheese unless ripened for at least 90 days (Marth 1969). 1946: Brucella abortus is found to survive in cheddar cheese made from raw… [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:37 pm
Bankalar bu kararla borçlu üzerinde çok daha büyük bir baskı kurabiliyor. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:02 pm
Hayner, Priscilla B. 2002. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 3:59 pm
Written by: Jay B. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:11 pm
Barry, K. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
(i) This is precisely what happened in T 951/92 cited by the petitioner: the Board found that the ED had not acted in compliance with A 96 and A 97, R 51(3) EPC 1973 (A 94(3); R 71(2) EPC 2000), which require that any communication under A 94(3) EPC shall contain a reasoned statement covering, where appropriate, all the grounds against the grant of the European patent. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 4:15 am
Here are the details of plaintiff’s injuries: compound mid-shaft fracture of the proximal phalanx of the left (non-dominant) middle finger next day surgery: open reduction internal fixation surgery with three K-wires drilled into the bone; extensor tendon repair on 10/24/06: removal of the K-wires series of epidural steroid and trigger point injections on 12/7/08: cervical radiofrequency sympathectomy on 5/13/09: myoblock (type B) Botox injection on 8/3/09: surgery… [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:34 am
As noted the other day, Claire McIvor, a senior lecturer, at the Birmingham Law School, has published an interesting U.K. perspective on the use of epidemiologic and statistical evidence in health-outcome litigation. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:19 am
Gilbert is on a six-month leave from the newspaper to take part in the project, supported by the Law School’s Sheldon B. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
(my emphasis)*** Translation of the German original ***[3] When refusing the application, the Examining Division (ED) based [its decision] on A 53(a) in connection with R 28(c) according to which uses of human embryos for industrial or commercial purposes are excluded from patentability. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
This meant that, strictly speaking, A 102(1) EPC 1973 did not provide the legal basis for revoking the patent if the patent as amended did not meet, for example, the requirements of A 84 or A 123(3) or R 27 or R 29 EPC 1973. [read post]
