Search for: "Legall v. State" Results 2101 - 2120 of 88,712
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
To make it sound more authoritative, and to tie the proposed alternative legal theory into the legal tradition governing suits on account by merchants, the word order was flipped: Account Stated. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
Pervasive skepticism toward state legal processes is a long road with no turning. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 8:23 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
The latest issue of International Legal Materials (Vol. 48, no. 5, September 2009) is out. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:53 pm by Kristen Matteucci
For example, Fastcase’s collection of Treatises and Books includes titles such as Business Torts: A Fifty-State Guide and Fifty State Construction Lien and Bond Law, while Lexis+ contains ABA titles like Fifty-State Survey: The Law of Class Action and Fifty-State Survey: Daubert v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Available for download at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2784890 “This essay supports an emphasis on evolving standards of human responsibility for animals’ welfare and critiques the concept of legal personhood for chimpanzees set forth in the plaintiff’s brief in the State of New York Supreme Court, County of New York lawsuit The Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 4:49 pm by Denese Dominguez
Subsequent to the trial court's response to the jury note, the State filed a motion to reconsider. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:50 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Legal Services Board granted an application by the Bar Standards Board, Solicitors Regulation Authority and ILEX Professional Standards Board for approval of alterations to their regulatory arrangements to give effect to the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates, which provides for criminal advocates in England and Wales to be assessed by judges. [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In determining a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the court is concerned with only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:46 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
  Still, the Court has a valuable opportunity to affirm the distinction, long overlooked in infringement, between mental states regarding actions and mental states regarding the legal implications of those actions. [read post]