Search for: "People v. Story"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 9,952
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 4:30 pm
The judgement in the case of Beizaras and Levickas v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
(For an excellent telling of James Batson’s story and the legacy of this decision, check out the More Perfect Podcast, Object Anyway.) [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:53 am
Miquel MontañáIn Odiorne v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am
And, equally "of course," it would be easy to go through the Wall Street Journal and find multiple stories about business executives who have been fired or turn to the sports pages and find stories of coaches who have been suspended, with or without pay, while further investigation of allegations takes place. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
” Stories about dysfunctional people, miserable lives, unhappiness, seem to be of great interest. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
512 was a different story: politically necessary, not necessary for treaty compliance. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 9:00 pm
Greensburg Community School Corp.In Hayden v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 11:21 am
Facebook * New Essay: The Complicated Story of FOSTA and Section 230 * Who Benefited from FOSTA? [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 8:14 am
” The court continues to live up to this reputation in Eaglin v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 10:19 am
This reinstatement came after a 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 10:19 am
This reinstatement came after a 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
The other two, CREW v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
New on the podcast: Black Lives Matter, a qualified immunity cert petition (Kelsay v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:25 am
Dillon v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 11:10 am
In Falbo v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am
At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter looks to past precedent in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Devoted to “Hard National Security Choices,” the site features top-quality writing and analysis from experts on developing stories in the national security arena, relevant legislation, and judicial opinions. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
Maghu v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am
The arguments in favour of introducing the technology tended to focus on sound and practical considerations, such as the security and health and safety of staff and other users and income protection in that, by substituting the technology for people for particular tasks, those people could be used more effectively (for example, in that they are able to provide health and fitness advice, rather than being used to monitor who entered and left the facility). [read post]
