Search for: "Plaintiffs Lead Counsel"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 6,279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2017, 12:11 pm
Ultimately, each case for parental “unfitness” will be fact specific but what the Raynor case demonstrates are facts that can help lead to a finding of unfitness. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:11 pm
Ultimately, each case for parental “unfitness” will be fact specific but what the Raynor case demonstrates are facts that can help lead to a finding of unfitness. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
More precisely, the defendants believe that because the plaintiffs either did not read, were not actually misled by, or at the very least, were not in danger of defaulting on their debts as a result of Paragraph 12 (either because they were not served with the complaint or because they retained counsel and moved to dismiss it), the statutory violation did not give rise to a concrete harm. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:00 am
Dolejsi will also serve as one of seven attorneys on the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee The post Holly Dolejsi of Robins Kaplan Appointed Farxiga MDL Co-Lead Counsel appeared first on Legal Reader. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
Plaintiffs would have us redraw this legislative compromise by concluding that environmental review is mandatory in the case of general plan amendments, and that therefore such amendments cannot be enacted by initiative. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
Plaintiffs would have us redraw this legislative compromise by concluding that environmental review is mandatory in the case of general plan amendments, and that therefore such amendments cannot be enacted by initiative. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:38 pm
McGee may not be the "final decisionmaker" as to issuesregarding pricing, product design or those otherwise made in light of similar information about acompetitor (like Wombat), he plays a very important role in the process that leads to thosedecisions. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
The plaintiff filed a motion to compel and in-camera inspection of the allegedly privileged documents. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm
First, company general counsel increasingly will use litigation funding to address and solve litigation funding difficulties. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Stern, of counsel; Mr. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
According to the report of this case, the demand to settle was $1,200,000 which conflicts with what plaintiff’s counsels had noted. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:54 pm
Doing so is likely to lead to civil litigation and perhaps even criminal penalties. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 1:43 pm
A recent order from the court is as follows: By SEPTEMBER 15 AT NOON, counsel for plaintiff Waymo LLC shall file a declaration under oath responding to each and every accusation of discovery misconduct by Waymo [made by] defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., and Ottomotto LLC’s (collectively, “Uber”). [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:21 am
He requests counsel, but questioning continues; he surrenders the password to his phone. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 3:42 am
” Plaintiff argued that one expert’s testimony was speculative because he “disagree[d] with the leading authoritative text in his field and [did] not know if any of his opinions [were] generally accepted by others in his field. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 2:49 am
As attackers have become more discerning and sophisticated, the impact of breaches on companies has moved from the realm of plaintiffs’ counsel imagination to real operational impact. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
But such a claim requires the defendant’s action be a proximate cause of the plaintiff’s alleged injury. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:28 am
After jury empanelment, “lead counsel’s” renewed motion to withdraw was permitted due to what he described as an ethical conflict. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 9:17 am
Of the three movants, the court appointed the Alameda County Employees’ Retirement Association and Arkansas Teacher Retirement System (collectively, the "Retirement Group") as lead plaintiff and approved the selection of counsel. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:34 pm
The law also recognized the tort of “criminal conversation,” which basically consists of a defendant’s having adulterous sex with plaintiff’s spouse, though of course such conduct may also often lead to an alienation of affections claim. [read post]
