Search for: "STATE v CLARK" Results 2101 - 2120 of 3,835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2018, 5:18 am by Victoria Clark
  Steve Slick reviewed Loch Johnson’s book “Spy Watching: Intelligence Accountability in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm by Eleonora Rosati
This year, the keynote speech will be delivered by Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer at the UKIPO.Starting at 2 pm and finishing with drinks and canapes from 6:15pm at Simmons’ offices in Citypoint, Moorgate, the full line up is below:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome (Darren Meale)14:40-15:40 – Panel 1 – “When you do nothing or you can’t do anything – acquiescence and other modern challenges in trade mark… [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Lefkowitz & Steven Menashi, Brief of Amici Curiae Former Justice Department Officials in Support of Petitioners in Zubik v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
In December of 2011, Clark Roberts and Sean Howley, two engineers at Wyko Tire Technology, were convicted by a jury for stealing trade secrets, a crime under the federal Economic Espionage Act (EEA). [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 11:09 am by Vishnu Kannan
Circuit’s ruling in Qassim v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Aaron
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
Examining Diageo Brands BV v Simiramida-04 EOOD [2015] C-681/13) James drew attention to the CJEU’s strict approach to countries refusing to enforce judgments from another Member State on the grounds of public policy. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
Clark (1985) 38 Cal.3d 355 (California Supreme Court)). [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Hughes, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:04 pm
Clark (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 1409, 1420 [the death of an important witness may constitute prejudice]; Stafford v. [read post]