Search for: "State v. Argus "
Results 2101 - 2120
of 85,033
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 9:13 am
In UCB v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 7:10 am
He came back, was caught, and now argues that cultivation is not an aggravated felony because the state statute (California) lists such things as cultivating, planting, harvesting, drying and processing. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Villoldo v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:24 am
’” Quoting Friends of the Earth, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 10:41 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 11:18 am
Henning Lahmann (ESMT Berlin - Digital Society Institute) has posted 'Hacking Back' by States and the Uneasy Place of Necessity within the Rule of Law (Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, forthcoming). [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 2:48 pm
By Kiran Jassal The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard oral arguments for Lee v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm
Army Corps v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 7:34 am
In SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm
The Court continues by stating that: Google does not lead evidence to the effect, or argue, that it or the public will suffer irreparable harm as a result of the specific order made below. [ . . . ]. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm
The Court held that that the procedure established under Art. 259 TFEU was designed to obtain a declaration that the conduct of a Member State was in breach of EU law and to terminate that conduct (see, to that effect, Joined Cases 15/76 and 16/76 France v Commission [1979]; Case C-456/05 Commission v Germany [2007]; and Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Sweden and Others v API and Commission [2010]).Thus, as the aim of the Treaty was to achieve… [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 5:05 am
It also argued that IRIS’s exclusiveremedy is an action against the United States under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:31 am
State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:31 pm
In Matrixx Initiatives Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
United States, No. 14-378. [read post]
