Search for: "State v. Back"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 42,101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2010, 6:10 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 9:56 am
But this same opinion could easily have been written back then. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:09 am
Appeal Board) v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2010 NY Slip Op 01854, Decided on March 11, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn May 1991 Cynthia T. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
The Israeli High Court of Justice’s Dec. 12 decision in Abu Ghosh v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 11:54 am
” A.D. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 7:40 am
Carapezza and State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:46 am
when the state Supreme Court released it’s landmark Curry v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 2:00 am
Kellogg v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 2:00 am
Kellogg v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 4:18 am
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:26 pm
The case was removed to the Federal Court, and it was remanded back to the state court. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court suggests why that is a mistake on North Carolina’s part.In Berger v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 5:19 am
Additional Resources: Burgueno v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
Ultimately, Bilski v Kappos says more about how patent law is made in the United States than about patentable subject matter. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 6:33 pm
Shqeirat v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:34 am
The court of appeals, however, rejected the State's invitation because it felt bound to follow its own previous holding in Durbin v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 7:00 am
Additional Resources: Jefferson Packing House LLC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:16 am
This is an important question of state law, as deference can allow an agency to win even when its legal position is not the best interpretation of the law.[1] Over the past decade, state legislatures,[2] state courts,[3] and the public[4] have begun to grow wary of the power that deference cedes to state agencies and have started to pare it back. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:59 pm
Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund (U.S., March 20, 2018) (affirming determination that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act did not strip state courts of Securities Act jurisdiction, nor empower defendants to remove such actions to federal court)MiscellaneousFrugal Flamingo v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 12:22 pm
Back in August 2016, the en banc 11th Circuit had 96 pages of opinions in this AEDPA case (Wilson v. [read post]
