Search for: "State v. Prime"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 3,301
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2014, 12:00 pm
The decision below is a prime example of the current dysfunctional state of the law in the Federal Circuit. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am
Anyone other than a clergyman would immediately have been a prime suspect. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:39 pm
If the project goes ahead, we could witness a a potential replay on American soil of the scenario in the notorious Indian case of Amar Nath Sehgal v Union of India. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:10 am
Despite comments made last week by Russian deputy prime minister Dmitry Rogozin that Russia would ban the use of the RD-180 engine to launch US military payloads, an Atlas V 401 rocket, powered by such an engine, lifted off Thursday morning from Cape Canaveral carrying a classified payload for the National Reconnaissance Office. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
On May 19, 2014 the NBA released a Memorandum stating that it had initiated a charge to conduct a vote of the other 29 NBA team's governors to terminate Mr. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:41 am
Justice Carolyn Berger’s 14-page opinion in ATP Tour Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:00 pm
I am writing, of course, about National Federation of Businesses v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm
The judge in Gardener v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:23 am
The Federal Circuit cites “Tale of Two Cities” but others may find Jarndyce v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:50 am
The saga of the use of the RD-180 engine in the United States took a new turn on Tuesday when Russian deputy prime minister Dmitry Rogozin indicated that RD-180 engines exported to the US for use on the Atlas V could not be used for launches of military payloads. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:09 am
For starters, Scott was past his physical prime and therefore not worth very much as a slave. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:39 am
A big one is Ames v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:59 pm
Spicer v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:29 pm
In the two-page order, Judge Susan Braden said her decision was based on the letters she received from the Departments of Commerce, State, and Treasury stating that they had not found that payments to Energomash contravened the sanctions on Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:52 am
In filings with the court Tuesday, government lawyers provided letters from officials in the Departments of State and Treasury that argued that sanctions that applied to Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin didn’t block payments to Energomash, since the US government hadn’t made an “affirmative determination” that Rogozin controlled, and profited from, Energomash. [read post]
5 May 2014, 3:07 pm
“In other words, Defendant asks the Court to permit the Government to continue to provide funds to Defendant-Intervenor even if Defendant cannot certify that those funds will flow to NPO Energomash and/or other entities that may be under the control of Deputy Prime Minister Rogozin,” the document states. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:47 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 2:07 pm
Laws c. 143 § 51, (“§ 51″) a plaintiff may be able to bring a strict liability claim against a building owner for injuries caused by violating state building codes under § 51. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:58 am
James v. [read post]
