Search for: "State v. Record" Results 2101 - 2120 of 44,177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Morris [Plaintiff] v Suffolk County [Respondent], Plaintiff appealed the judgment of Supreme Court [1] denying Plaintiff's petition seeking the disclosure of certain records pursuant to New York State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL];* [2] denying an award of attorney's fees and litigation costs; and [3] dismissing the proceeding.The Appellate Division modified and reinstated, on the law, those branches of the petition which sought to compel disclosure of… [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Morris [Plaintiff] v Suffolk County [Respondent], Plaintiff appealed the judgment of Supreme Court [1] denying Plaintiff's petition seeking the disclosure of certain records pursuant to New York State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL];* [2] denying an award of attorney's fees and litigation costs; and [3] dismissing the proceeding.The Appellate Division modified and reinstated, on the law, those branches of the petition which sought to compel disclosure of… [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Further, the court opined that "the appointing authority's request for 'any and all medical records relating to [Petitioner's] current state of health' was overly broad and not reasonably tailored in scope in that it sought medical records beyond those that were relevant to [Petitioner's] mental capacity to perform his duties. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
At this critical moment, it is urgent to introduce what was sorely missing from the case’s record, giving voice to those left out of the courtroom. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
Murthy v Missouri may become a landmark Supreme Court case in which the justices are led astray on the basis of a disinformation-laden record. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:46 pm by PaulKostro
(stating that in camera proceedings “impl[y] the necessity of recorded fact-finding by the trial judge”), certif. denied, 182 N.J. 147 (2004). [read post]