Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 2101 - 2120 of 4,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 8:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  That’s b/c modern TM law is to protect TM owners, with consumers just used as a mechanism. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Consumer appliances aren’t covered w/any exemptions; that will be an additional class. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
You have 2 choices: go ahead and hope that in the event of litigation you’ll end up in the Fed. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:34 am by Eric Goldman
PissedConsumer * Newspaper’s Discussion About Trademark Owner Protected as Nominative Use–1 800 GET THIN v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Redbox Redbox Can be Liable Under the Video Privacy Protection Act for Failure to Purge Video Rental Records — Sterk v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am by Laura Donohue
  On the consumer side, there is no overarching law to protect private data. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:44 am by Bill Marler
Since then Listeria has been implicated in many outbreaks of food-borne illness, most commonly from exposure to contaminated dairy products and prepared meat products, including turkey and deli meats, pâté, hot dogs and seafood and fish. [4]Given its widespread presence in the environment and food supply, the ingestion of Listeria has been described as an “exceedingly common occurrence. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  A litany of alleged failures to protect the PII, PFI, or PPI of the putative plaintiff class typically is at the forefront of the allegations in these cases. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Kathy Garmezy, Directors Guild of America: Independent directors—if DMCA continues, assume there are no protections and find alternative ways to make up revenue. [read post]