Search for: "Thomas Read" Results 2101 - 2120 of 15,919
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2022, 8:37 am by John Aloysius Cogan Jr.
She was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 8:34 am by Howard Friedman
”Justice Thomas filed a brief concurring opinion, saying in part:[W]e have held that “the First Amendment protects public employee speech only when it falls within the core of First Amendment protection— speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 Justice Thomas's opinion is atrocious for many reasons, which I could write 100 pages about. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:40 pm by Josh Blackman
In that case, the Court favors the reading that protects a right to keep and bear arms. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:32 pm by lennyesq
Justices Thomas and Kavanaugh filed concurring opinions. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 11:49 am by Daniel Schwartz
  But it’s apparent from the first few reads of the Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:23 am by David Oscar Markus
 We've all read Justice Thomas' concurrence in Dobbs by now and it's pretty frightening. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
The main residence of Veraton, circa 1907. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:58 am
 When you read Thomas's concurrence, keep saying to yourselves "if they can do that- if they can find that right- what else can they do? [read post]
Among those precedents Justice Thomas identified by name are The Court’s 1965 opinion in Griswold v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:56 pm by Dale Carpenter
(As an aside, I don't count Justice Thomas's view as portending much. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Jane S. Schacter
Moreover, in his stark concurrence, Justice Thomas unabashedly calls for the whole doctrine supporting these rights to be thrown out. [read post]
Read this Legal Aggregate post with Stanford’s John Donohue on Guns, Mass Shootings, and the Law in the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:26 am
Madison, writing "after a careful reading and re-reading of the constitution, and viewing several you tube videos on the matter, we cannot find the right to judicial review and precedent in the Constitution". [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 am by Howard Friedman
When the majority says that we must read our foundational charter as viewed at the time of ratification (except that we may also check it against the Dark Ages), it consigns women to second-class citizenship....The Framers (both in 1788 and 1868) understood that the world changes. [read post]