Search for: "U.S. v. Lee*" Results 2101 - 2120 of 3,429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
From crowd-sourcing and domain squatting websites for the next U.S. president to a frame-by-frame recreation of the entire Bee movie, MSCHF is redefining what it means to challenge norms of traditional art and law.[1] With antics including a “Ketchup or Makeup” art drop in collaboration with Rihanna’s Fenty Beauty brand or a series of fake Andy Warhols amidst an original, this art collective is certainly causing a bit of MSCHF and testing the extent of creativity in art… [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Olson, 495 U.S. 91 (1990), is instructive on that topic. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm by JLiu
Similarly, Title V reforms the National Security Letter program by extending the ban on bulk collection, except by way of application based on a “specific selection term,” to various provisions in the U.S. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that  test. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am by Anna Salvatore
” The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this morning in Nestlé USA v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The handbook was prepared by the Office of Chief Counsel for the Criminal Tax Division and obtained through the Freedom of Information Act....The IRS continued to take the same position, the documents indicate, even after a federal appeals court ruled in the 2010 case U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:51 am by Hannah Kris
Steve Vladeck discussed Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s views on Morrison v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
In the face of this traditional judicial lassitude, “[v]igorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof” were all a litigant could hope to accomplish in litigation. [read post]