Search for: "United States v. Charles"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am
The speech, even if erroneous or knowingly false might fall outside First Amendment protections, especially if they were spoken by an ordinary person, not the President of the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 1:09 am
The memo take great pains to emphasize that while the case was pending, the Second Circuit entered its opinion in Fait v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:20 pm
See also, Harris v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:52 am
Coleman Jr. became the first black person to serve as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:23 am
The nongovernmental organisations which are signatories to the Joint Memorandum of Understanding on Fire and Building Safety (dated March 15, 2012), having stated their intention to support the implementation of this programme, shall, at their own election, be signed witnesses to this Agreement. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:06 pm
At a juncture when both democratic and authoritarian regimes across the world are vested to persecuting their host Muslim populations, The New Crusades interrogates–through trenchant analysis and direct testimony of Muslims on the ground–how Islamophobia stands as a unifying global thread of both state and societal bigotry. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:10 pm
V. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am
http://bit.ly/LPLQcg (Bob Ambrogi) Model Behavior: Federal and State Court Rules on eDiscovery - - http://bit.ly/Mk6eHa (Jessica Mederson) Phase 2 of Discovery Pilot Provides Glimpse into Future of eDiscovery – - http://bit.ly/Oxc1V6 (BLLAWG) Robots Are Not Replacing eDiscovery Lawyers - http://bit.ly/MkKifa (Jason Krause) Rules for eDiscovery Vendors in D.C.: Taking A Step Back - http://bit.ly/Lt2hP4 (Cynthia Courtney)… [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am
State Department spokesperson Ned Price said yesterday. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
This was cause for Nixon’s concern, and his scheme to block the peace talks from occurring.Per the notes, which I have translated and summarized, Nixon instructed Haldeman that Bryce “Harlow [should be] monitoring [the situation in] V[iet] Nam. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm
Of the 1,400 people who have voted thus far in our reader poll, only 34 percent would vote “guilty” if they were jurors in the case of State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
Here Teles draws on Charles Epp's very important work on the legal support structure for rights revolutions. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
It’s like finding out that you went to high school with Charles Keating. [read post]
